THE BASIC PRINCIPLES OF LATEST CASE LAWS ON CRPC

The Basic Principles Of latest case laws on crpc

The Basic Principles Of latest case laws on crpc

Blog Article

However, the above observation is without prejudice into the legal rights with the parties, arising out with the over marriage on the couple, if any, pending before the competent court of law. Read more

Case regulation is specific for the jurisdiction in which it absolutely was rendered. As an illustration, a ruling in a California appellate court would not normally be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is really a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; Should the parents on the boy or Lady don't approve of such inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they will do if they are able to cut off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman that's a major, the few is neither harassed by any one nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who offers these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against this kind of person(s) as provided by legislation.

Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that could possibly be consulted in deciding a current case. It might be used to guide the court, but is just not binding precedent.

13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some length, both parties have agreed into the disposal of the instant petition to the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner as well as private respondents and will acquire care of each of the aspects of the case and assure that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.

Though there is not any prohibition against referring to case law from a state other than the state in which the case is being heard, it holds small sway. Still, if there is no precedent while in the home state, relevant case regulation from another state could be thought of with the court.

116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice with the Peace u/s 22-A will not be obliged to afford an opportunity of hearing into the accused party; check here nor obliged to automatically or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is needed to look at all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal legislation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are several of the relevant factors. Read more

The court system is then tasked with interpreting the regulation when it can be unclear how it applies to any offered situation, generally rendering judgments based over the intent of lawmakers along with the circumstances from the case at hand. Such decisions become a guide for long run similar cases.

163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is well-settled that when thinking about the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority needs to look at the merit of the many qualified candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to these kinds of eligible candidates who're found to generally be most meritorious among them. Because the petitioner was held for being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was dismissed from the respondent department just to increase favor to the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy within the part from the respondent department.

Summaries offer concise explanations of legal principles and significant cases pertaining to land ownership, real estate transactions, property rights, and related matters, aiding you in understanding the intricacies of land and property legislation.

The Cornell Regulation School website offers various information on legal topics, which include citation of case law, as well as supplies a video tutorial on case citation.

Any court may well request to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to succeed in a different conclusion. The validity of this kind of distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to your higher court.

As being the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is reached, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) on the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

Therefore, this petition is found for being not maintainable and is particularly dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners may possibly look for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

Report this page